Judging by Law or Feelings?
Should judges base their decisions on an impartial evaluation of the law as applied to the facts? Or should they judge based upon the criterion set forth by President Obama — “empathy”? Do men and women, young and old, white and black, rich and poor, have different versions of law, truth, and justice?
Even more than her liberal views on most subjects, the greatest danger posed by Judge Sotomayor may be her subjective approach to judging. For more, see Judge Moore’s WorldNetDaily column “Judging by law or feeling (http://www NULL.wnd NULL.com/index NULL.php?pageId=100628)?”
(http://www NULL.addtoany NULL.com/share_save)
Real Ethics Cry
Our judges question still today the God that gives us life. All praise to Him brings peace on earth, but big money comes through war and strife.
They’ve made a bust of Themis to bend your point of view; the interpretation of our law is a myth to judges too!
Some say to us, there are no rules “that laws are made to break;†But when they face the Final Judge you’ll hear, “for heavens’ sake.â€
Now some say that Bush was wrong to start these unjust wars, I only know there was consent and some congressmen are whores.
Fathers die on battlefields and history tells just why. Money is made selling war machines but still the children cry.
As the blood of saints gone out to war are crying out to God. Our leaders sins are soon revealed and God spares not the rod.
The blood the blood its judgement time as Jesus truly said; all men must listen to the blood or they will be twice dead.
Author- James E. Reeves
195Phillips Ridge Rd., Empire, Alabama 35063
Note- The constitution is law or this is not a republic but Marxism in practise isn’t it?